Exploring ADR Techniques: Mediation, Arbitration, and Beyond

ABOUT THE BLOG

The blog suggests some alternatives to going to court, like encouraging people to settle their disputes before going to trial or using special programs to help people reach fair agreements.        

-----------------------------------                      

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, disputes have been resolved through litigation, involving time-consuming court proceedings and substantial costs. However, an increasing recognition of the drawbacks associated with traditional litigation has led to a growing emphasis on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms. There are different ways to resolve arguments, and some of them are better than others. For example, jury trials can be good because they follow specific rules, but they can also be slow and expensive. So, they might become less popular in the future. People also consider other things when deciding how to resolve disputes, like being fair to everyone involved, following the rules, and how it affects relationships between people. They also think about how well the system works for different types of disputes. The best option is a low-cost system that people can choose to use. The next best option is procedures that are required before going to a jury trial. The least desirable option is forcing people to use something other than a jury trial.  

UNDERSTANDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) means solving disputes outside the court room in an informal manner. ADR provides various kinds of processes that help the parties to solve their dispute without court trial. The primary ADR methods include mediation and arbitration. ADR methods involve a third party who helps in solving the dispute between parties by arriving at a cooperative decision through discussions and negotiations. In many cases, ADR methods are used side by side with the litigation process as well through court authorization. It offers to facilitate the resolution of civil, commercial, industrial, and family etc., matters where it is impossible to initiate any process of negotiation or arrive at mutually agreeable solution. It is non adversarial for everyone, where parties work together to find a resolution. It can be effective in reducing the burden of cases on courts. Generally, the decision given by ADR must be in written form. The use of ADR allowed the parties to find a middle ground and avoid prolonged litigation in the court system.

TYPES OF ADR MECHANISMS

ADR is classified into following types-

1) Arbitration –

• It is less formal than a court trial, also the rule of evidence is sometimes relaxed. Arbitral tribunal makes a decision, also known as "award" on the dispute and it is mostly binding on the parties.

• Generally, there is no right to appeal an arbitrator's award.

• Generally, the scope for judicial intervention is very little in the arbitration process. Exception is given to some interim measures.

• Arbitration can offer a faster and more cost-effective resolution compared to traditional litigation. Parties can choose arbitrators with expertise in the specific area of law relevant to their case, ensuring a decision-maker familiar with the intricacies of the issues involved. 

• Example: In a product liability case, a consumer may agree to arbitration with the manufacturer. The arbitrator's decision on compensation and liability would be final, saving both parties the time and expenses associated with a court trial.

2) Conciliation –

• It's like a more relaxed version of arbitration. Conciliator, the impartial third party, assists the parties to a dispute in reaching a mutually agreed settlement of the dispute.

• The parties are not bound by the recommendations of the conciliator, they are free to accept or reject it. However, if both parties accept the settlement drawn by the conciliator, it will be final and binding on both.

3) Mediation –

• A mediator is like a helper who tries to make two arguing groups or people agree on a solution to their problem. 

• The mediator doesn't choose the solution for them, but instead, they assist the groups or people in talking to each other so they can figure out a solution together.

• Mediation becomes a suitable option when individuals aim to maintain their relationship despite encountering conflicts. In instances where family members, neighbors, or business associates find themselves in disagreements, choosing mediation over legal proceedings may be more advantageous. Unlike a court trial, mediation is non-binding, giving the parties control over the outcome. The confidential nature of mediation can encourage parties to share information openly, promoting a more thorough understanding of each other's perspectives.

• It's important to note that mediation can be sought at any stage of the legal process, including during appeals, providing the involved parties with a flexible and accessible means of resolving their disputes.

• Example: In a medical malpractice case, a patient who suffered harm may choose mediation. During the process, the patient and healthcare provider may agree on a settlement that includes an apology, corrective actions to prevent future incidents, and a compensation amount, avoiding the time and costs associated with a lengthy trial.

4) Negotiation –

• It happens in different places like businesses, charities, government, courts, and even in our personal lives like when we get married, divorced, raise kids, or just go about our daily activities.

• Here, discussions between the parties are initiated without the intervention of any third party with the object of arriving at a negotiated settlement to the dispute. This method is very common.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------